Submissions: Published response

Unilever
14 May 2021

What is your name? - Name

John Dempsey

What is your organisation? - Organisation

Unilever

1. Are there any other benefits and costs to you resulting from each of the three reform options that you think should be considered? Are there any notable impacts which have not been included? - Provide response here

Not Answered

2. Can you see any issues with the regulatory burden costings? Please describe any specific issues, including the assumptions used in estimating the regulatory burden. - Provide response here

Not Answered

3. Do you agree with the overall assessment that option 2 has the greatest net benefit? Why or why not? - Provide response here

Not Answered

4. What impacts, positive or negative, do you see for consumers in expanding the scope of shortfall to instead cover false or misleading measurement statements? - Provide response here

Not Answered

4. What impacts, positive or negative, do you see for consumers in expanding the scope of shortfall to instead cover false or misleading measurement statements? - Provide response here

Not Answered

5. What impacts do you think the proposed options regarding acceptable units of measurement will have for consumers? (For example, allowing greater flexibility for products to be sold by alternative units of measurement such as count, linear and area measurement, rather than mass and volume) - Provide response here

Not Answered

6. Are there any particular types of packaged products where retaining any of the existing presentational requirements (such as front of pack measurement marking) is important? If so, why? - Provide response here

Not Answered

Would you like to also respond to questions relevant to another stakeholder group? - Stakeholder

Not Answered

7. In what other ways can the measurement framework increase flexibility regarding how it regulates measuring instruments? How can confidence in measuring instruments be maintained under a flexible approach? - Provide response here

Not Answered

8. What is the impact of the potential uncertainty regarding the control mechanisms applying to trade measuring instruments and the need for increased consultations? - Provide response here

Not Answered

9. Can you provide any examples of technical barriers to approval faced by innovative instruments? What impacts have these had on your business? - Provide response here

Not Answered

Would you like to also respond to questions relevant to another stakeholder group? - Stakeholder

Not Answered

10. To what extent do you agree with the identified impacts and benefits of more streamlined (option 1) and flexible (options 2 and 3) appointment types? - Provide response here

Not Answered

10. To what extent do you agree with the identified impacts and benefits of more streamlined (option 1) and flexible (options 2 and 3) appointment types? - Provide response here

Not Answered

12. If the functions currently performed under a Public Weighbridge Licence were transitioned to a general licence in future, how would this impact you as a: - Provide response here

Not Answered

12. If the functions currently performed under a Public Weighbridge Licence were transitioned to a general licence in future, how would this impact you as a: - Provide response here

Not Answered

13. What impact would routine reporting have on utility meter verifiers (under all options) and legal metrology authorities (under options 2 and 3)? - Provide response here

Not Answered

13. What impact would routine reporting have on utility meter verifiers (under all options) and legal metrology authorities (under options 2 and 3)? - Provide response here

Not Answered

13. What impact would routine reporting have on utility meter verifiers (under all options) and legal metrology authorities (under options 2 and 3)? - Provide response here

Not Answered

Would you like to also respond to questions relevant to another stakeholder group? - Stakeholder

Not Answered

14. If you are a business who packs random measurement packaged products: - Provide response here

Not Answered

14. If you are a business who packs random measurement packaged products: - Provide response here

Not Answered

14. If you are a business who packs random measurement packaged products: - Provide response here

Not Answered

15. What burdens do you currently experience in understanding your current requirements under the measurement legislation? What can be done to reduce these? - Provide response here

Not Answered

16. Are there any particular types of packaged products where retaining any of the existing presentational requirements (e.g. front of pack measurement marking) is important? If so, why? - Provide response here

Not Answered

Would you like to also respond to questions relevant to another stakeholder group? - Stakeholder

Not Answered

17. What measurement services do you depend on most as a regulator in order to be able to trust the measurements you rely on? - Provide response here

Not Answered

17. What measurement services do you depend on most as a regulator in order to be able to trust the measurements you rely on? - Provide response here

Not Answered

Unique ID

78112120