Response 385280950

Back to Response listing

Privacy Collection Statement

1. Do you agree to the Privacy Collection Statement?

Please select one item
(Required)
Ticked Yes, I agree
Yes, I agree and would like to make a confidential submission
No, I do not agree (exit consultation)

Introduction

1. Who are you responding on behalf of?

Please select one item
(Required)
Individual
Ticked Organisation

2. What is your name?

Name
Mr Richard Saul

3. What is your organisation (if applicable)?

What is your organisation (if applicable)?
Ocean Oils Pty Ltd

4. What is your position/title in your organisation (if applicable)?

What is your position/title in your organisation (if applicable)?
Managing Director

6. Submission

General comment
Ocean Oils Pty Ltd is the only Australian Manufacturer of premium grade Squalene and Shark Liver Oil (SLO). It is amazing to note that NOT ONE Complimentary Medicines (CM) player in Australia chooses to use Australian Squalene or SLO yet there are countless CM players claiming to do so. In order to maximise profit, all are instead using cheaper, inferior imported ingredients and use the ‘Australian Made’ logo and endorsement to legitimise and masquerade their imported materials as being Australian in origin and manufacture.

In addition, all are in various ways falsely claiming and/or inferring their imported ingredients are derived from high quality Australian sources in order to sell to unsuspecting consumers in Australia and internationally their fully imported products.

For many years the Complimentary Medicines (CM) sector has promoted itself as ‘squeaky clean’ when an abundance of evidence shows the opposite to be true. It has enjoyed a dream run in its unethical activities with no accountability or scrutiny by government or relevant authorities or to the consuming public in Australia and overseas or to other sectors of genuine Australian industry upon whose hard won reputation it parasitically relies.
Please select one item
Questions for consumers
Questions for manufacturers of complementary medicines
Ticked Questions for businesses who are not manufacturers of complementary medicines

Questions for businesses who are not manufacturers of complementary medicines

1. Do you currently use the AMAG logo on any of your products?

Please select one item
Yes
Ticked No

2. Are you a supplier or brand owner of complementary medicines?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No

3. Are you a supplier, manufacturer or brand owner of ‘orthodox’ pharmaceutical or over-the-counter medicines?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No
If you answered yes, do you consider that any of the options represented should apply to your sector? Please outline pros and/or cons of the suggested options as they relate to your business.
Of the options presented, Option 3c is the only viable option likely to provide consumers with some real indication of the origin of the ingredients in CM products (aka Health Food Supplements) they are buying.

To enable consumers (and we are ALL consumers) to make an informed choice, this 3c option or similar needs to be mandatory and enforceable by the authorities and must clearly show the percentage content and country of origin of ALL ingredients in a CM product on the product labelling and attendant advertisements.

Consumers demand and deserve TRUTH IN LABELLING and genuine Australian producers deserve to be recognised and supported by the implementation of such an instrument.

4. For business not within the complementary or ‘orthodox’ medicines sector, do you support any of the options put forward in this consultation?

For business not within the complementary or ‘orthodox’ medicines sector, do you support any of the options put forward in this consultation?
Were we such a party, we would still insist the need for a system such as that proposed in option 3c; but definitely not 3a.

Options 3a, as promoted by CMA Australia, is an open licence for the sector to continue and increase its preferential use of cheaper, imported ingredients that are then endorsed as ‘Australian Made’ and masqueraded as Australian.

The current rotten practices of using and promoting fake imported products as ‘Australian’ preferentially enriches numerous unscrupulous players in the CM sector now dominated by Chinese interests and is at the great expense of genuine Australian producers and ingredient manufacturers. This extremely unfair situation is in desperate need of review and change.

5. Does your business/institution interact with the complementary medicines sector in any way?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No
If yes, please explain.
For more than 20 years, Ocean Oils Pty Ltd has been a trusted ingredient supplier to the complimentary medicines sector internationally and in Australia, with our major partners in Japan, USA and China. Such partners promote our ethically sourced products as Australian in quality, origin and purity.

Formerly, we supplied significant quantities to Australian pharmaceutical companies but, due to the CM sector's increasingly destructive practices enthusiastically supported by the AMCL's endorsement of entirely fake 'Australian' Squalene and SLO products with false content, origin and purity claims overseen and condoned by the Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA), there is much open counterfeiting and misrepresentation in store and online of substitute imported material ingredients by numerous unscrupulous CM players as 'Australian'.

Consequently, since 2012, requirements with Australian pharmaceutical companies for Australian Squalene and SLO have fallen to zero. Without exception, they now use cheap, inferior ingredients of dubious origins and openly cheat and lie to the authorities and market about their quality and origin in order to find favour in the eyes of the unsuspecting consumer who is seeking truly genuine Australian products.

The use by the CM sector of the ‘Australian Made’ logo and endorsement is crucial in this deception.

This unethical and unlawful behaviour within the CM sector occurs without penalty or interference despite all relevant authorities, including the TGA, AMCL and the Department of Industry, Innovation & Science being fully aware of the facts in this sad and disturbing situation.

Any robust and thorough audit of this bizarre situation would prove the above facts to be so.

6. What proportion of total ‘manufacturing’ of a product do you consider should take place in Australia to qualify for meeting a substantial transformation test and a ‘Made in Australia’ claim?

What proportion of total ‘manufacturing’ of a product do you consider should take place in Australia to qualify for meeting a substantial transformation test and a ‘Made in Australia’ claim?
The 'Substantial Transformation' test is a misguided and unwieldy concept and should be abandoned. Importantly, it is easily rorted to advantage by unethical CM players seeking the ‘Australian Made’ endorsement.

7. Do you believe that recognising the Australian based manufacturing processes for complementary medicine products will be beneficial for the brand of the AMAG logo?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No

8. Do you believe a different AMAG logo eligibility criteria for complementary medicine products will have an impact on food producers, consumers or other sectors that use the logo?

Please select one item
Ticked Yes
No
If yes, please explain.
For numerous reasons as stated above, it is evident to us the current 'Australian Made' endorsement situation for CM products is a farce and the plethora of fake ‘Australian Made’ endorsed Squalene, SLO and other products clearly indicates that proper administration of the logo is hopelessly inept or inadequate.

Regrettably this all occurs at the neglect and great expense of genuine Australian producers and ingredient manufacturers who struggle to compete against the fake competition.

If properly and competently managed and enforced with suitable penalties where applicable, a different, improved AM logo eligibility criteria for the CM sector (that shows the proportion and origin of all ingredient material) would have an extremely positive impact for Australian food producers, ingredient manufacturers and for all consumers.

Given that the CM sector so admires the ‘Made in Australia’ image they promote on their products made entirely from imported materials, it would be a refreshing change for the sector to instead embrace the use of genuine Australian ingredients (rather than the tactic of using cheap imported substitutes and intentionally misleading consumers about their origin). Adherence to improved origin labelling requirements enable the sector to honestly state the Australian content on their labels and advertising.

The current widespread misuse of the AM logo use by the CM sector is entirely biased and extremely unfair. Genuine Australian food producers and ingredient manufacturers have built the hard won reputation for Australian quality upon which the counterfeiters parasitically rely and unfairly benefit.
Australian and international consumers deserve better.

9. Do you consider that Options 3a, 3b or 3c, if instituted would diminish or improve the perceived value and understanding of the AMAG logo?

If so by how much:
Please select one item
Ticked A lot Somewhat A little Not at all
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
In the CM sector, there is a desperate need for the enforcement of TRUTH IN LABELLING. Regrettably, this is something against which the sector has been desperately and cunningly lobbying for years.

For the sake of all consumers and genuine Australian producers and ingredient manufacturers, the CM (Health Food Supplement) sector needs to be subject to the same labelling requirements as any others in the food sector where the origin and proportion of their ingredients are fully disclosed together with any 'Australian Made' endorsement, either by bar chart or percentage table or some equally clear, transparent and enforceable mechanism.

It is a fact in the marketplace that Australian and international consumers preferentially choose food and food ingredient products that they believe to be of Australian origin.

10. Please estimate the total cost (by dollar value) to your firm based on the following options for one full financial year:

Option 1
Cost - $12,000,000 over ten years
Option 2
Cost - $12,000,000 over ten years
Option 3a
Cost - $15,000,000 over ten years
Option 3b
N/A
Option 3c
N/A
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
Showing the actual ingredient content, proportion and origin of ALL ingredients is crucial if the real agenda by the CM sector and relevant authorities is that there be TRUTH IN LABELLING.

Option 1 – decadal average financial impact based on the past and current impact of activities in the CM sector due to on-going substitution and misrepresentation of Australian Squalene and SLO products by imported fakes. Also facilitates on-going confusion for consumers.

Option 2 – decadal financial impact based on past and current impact of activities in the CM sector due to on-going substitution and misrepresentation of Australian Squalene and SLO products by imported fakes. Given the current intentionally misleading and deceptive practices in the CM sector, this option is estimated to have a similar outcome and consequences for Australian ingredient suppliers to scenario 1. Also facilitates on-going confusion for consumers.

Option 3a – decadal on-going and increased financial impact based given the current observed lack of any effective regulation of the CM sector by the TGA for Squalene and SLO products.

It is extremely disturbing to us and to many consumers that the TGA indicates it has NO real specification, formulation or monograph for Squalene or Shark Liver Oil nor does it engage in enforcement of any relevant product quality control. We also witness that it allows numerous entities registered to pack Squalene and SLO to freely engage in intentionally misleading and deceptive product content, purity and origin labelling and advertising.

The effects of the TGA’s apparent apathy and mismanagement of the CM sector on Australian businesses striving to produce quality materials/ingredients are already disastrous and, under Option 3a, would be even more profound to say the least.

The very consideration of this extremely dangerous and naïve option shows a high level of bureaucratic ignorance, apathy and/or misunderstanding of current unscrupulous activities within the CM sector.

Option 3a would provide enhanced licence for unscrupulous CM players to continue and enlarge their intentionally misleading and deceptive activities using fake imported products.

It also facilitates on-going confusion for consumers.

11. Please estimate the total benefit (by dollar value) to your firm based on the following options for one full financial year:

Option 1
N/A
Option 2
N/A
Option 3a
N/A
Option 3b
Benefit - $2,000,000 over ten years
Option 3c
Benefit $6,000,000 over ten years
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
Showing the actual ingredient content and origin of ALL ingredients is crucial if the intent is that there is to be TRUTH IN LABELLING.

Option 3b – based on decadal purchasing and usage trends in the CM sector.

This option may provide encouragement for some CM players to use genuine Australian ingredients rather than fake imported ones.

Consumers would have a vague choice of 'Australian' vs 'Imported' ingredients that may in turn support the use of Australian raw materials and ingredients.

Regrettably, under this option, the origin and proportion remains unknown/unstated and this generates on-going confusion for consumers.

Option 3c - Of the options offered, and if mandated and enforced by government in the CM sector, this would be the best outcome for Australian and international consumers.

Of those presented, we believe Option 3c to be the best option to encourage and promote the use of genuine Australian ingredients/ raw materials by the CM sector seeking to use the AM logo and endorsements and promote their products as Australian in content and manufacture.

12. Please estimate the total benefit (by dollar value) to your firm based on the following options for one full financial year:

Option 1
?
Option 2
?
Option 3a
?
Option 3b
?
Option 3c
?
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
This question appears to be a repeat of question 11....????

13. Please describe the effect on Australian employment under:

Option 1
Reduce
Option 2
Reduce
Option 3a
Reduce
Option 3b
Increase
Option 3c
Substantial Increase
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
Under options 1, 2 and 3a, Australian raw material and ingredient manufacturers and their loyal suppliers will continue to be undermined, counterfeited and usurped by imported imitations. It will be increasingly difficult for suppliers of genuine Australian raw materials and ingredients to survive.

In order for players in the CM sector to justifiably access the coveted 'Australian Made’ logo and endorsement, Option 3c engages with the CM sector to seek and preferentially use Australian materials/ingredients over its present widespread practice of packaging imported ingredients that are misleadingly and deceptively promoted as Australian.

Innovative Australian raw material and ingredient start-ups wishing to supply the CM sector would also greatly benefit from better product content and origin labelling requirements because of the mandated recognition of genuine Australian content in a world where genuine Australian content and origin is preferentially sought and desired.

14. What difficulties and challenges will affect your business under the following options (please provide examples):

Option 1
Real threat to ongoing financial viability
Option 2
Real threat to ongoing financial viability
Option 3a
Increased threat to ongoing financial viability
Option 3b
Material operational benefit and enhanced financial viability
Option 3c
Substantial operational benefit and enhanced financial viability
Please provide the rationale for your calculation.
Option 1 - Continuation of the status quo. Our loyal international customers and distributors in China, Japan and USA that are struggling to market and support genuine Australian Squalene and SLO materials in their respective marketplaces against imported ‘Australian Made’ fakes will face continued and unfair competition against such products masquerading in store and online as 'Australian'.

Option 2 - ditto

Option 3a - Our loyal international customers and distributors in China, Japan and USA that are struggling to market and support genuine Australian Squalene and SLO materials in their respective marketplaces against imported ‘Australian Made’ fakes will face continued and unfair competition against such products masquerading as 'Australian'.

To legitimise and advance their current deceitful and dishonest practises, Option 3a will grant CM players and their numerous counterfeit (fake) Australian products even easier and unquestioned access to the 'Australian Made' logo.

Option 3b - Provides some recognition of Australian material/ingredient content in the CM sector.

Option 3c – Of the options offered, Option 3c provides for a real and clear recognition of Australian material/ingredient content and proportion.

In the global marketplace, it is evident that genuine Australian content is seen as an extremely positive feature and the promotion of same is an effective marketing tool.

If mandatory, enforced and properly administered, Option 3c would substantially assist in ending the deception to the consumer and encourage the CM sector to seek and use Australian raw materials and ingredients over inferior imported materials that are currently masqueraded as Australian.

We are keenly aware consumers prefer Australian over inferior, imported and unethically sourced Squalene and Shark Liver Oil and that is why the evidence shows that so many players vending these products go to greatly lengths to intentionally misrepresent the quality, composition and origin of their products as Australian.

15. Do you have any further views or comments?

Do you have any further views or comments?
Please see the attached two documents in support of this submission:-

1. 2016-10-03 Research Paper and attachments - TGA registered & approved Squalene 'Made in Australia .pdf
2. 2019010-13 A Study of TGA registered Complimentary Medicines - Use and Abuse of the AMCL logo and False claims for Squalene .pdf

Thank you for reading.