Make a submission: Published response

Return to published responses
Patrick Stokes, Adam Buben, and Timothy Neal

Published name

Patrick Stokes, Adam Buben, and Timothy Neal

1. Do the proposed principles adequately capture high-risk AI?

No

Please provide any additional comments.

Please see the attached submission

Are there any principles we should add or remove?

Yes

2. Do you have any suggestions for how the principles could better capture harms to First Nations people, communities and Country?

Yes

Please provide any additional comments.

Though this is not covered directly in our submission, considering the application of AI to materials generated by dead people may help to identify and address cultural safety implications for First Nations people.

5. Are the proposed principles flexible enough to capture new and emerging forms of high-risk AI, such as general-purpose AI (GPAI)?

No

Please provide any additional comments.

Please see our attached submission

8. Do the proposed mandatory guardrails appropriately mitigate the risks of AI used in high-risk settings?

No

16. Where do you see the greatest risks of gaps and inconsistencies with Australia’s existing laws for the development and deployment of AI?

As discussed in the attached submission.